How about your new jars of homemade salsa?
What Does It Really Mean? A diagnosis of borderline personality disorder could, theoretically, mean that the psychiatrist made a serious attempt at evaluating defense mechanisms and ego integrity; or at least a matching of symptoms to DSM criteria.
A diagnosis is based on pathology, or at least on a set of predetermined criteria. I diagnosis must be both reliable-- multiple doctors would find the same diagnosis when given the same information, and valid-- the diagnosis actually is the thing you say it is.
Many psychiatrists devalue diagnoses into heuristics, that is, they have intuitive "rules of thumb" that are extensions of their own cognitive biases. However, in general they are diagnosed very unrigorously, if such a thing can be imagined of psychiatrists.
A good example is borderline.
If a psychiatrist calls it borderline, it may or may not be, actually, borderline personality, a la Kernberg. In that case, the word suddenly means something completely different than it ordinarily does: But white people know exactly what it means in that context.
Those "things" however, are uncoupled from the "official" diagnosis. The heuristic may have a lot, or absolutely no, relationship to the diagnosis. In other words, the term "borderline" is immensely reliable among psychiatrists, but not at all between psychiatrists and non-psychiatrists, who think it means something else.
What psychiatrists should have done is invented their own special word for the heuristic of "borderline. First, borderline is a heuristic of countertransference: Second, borderline is meant as a synonym for any of the following: Third, it is generally reserved for the following four types: Very attractive female, who comes for problems the psychiatrist considers ordinary: It is diagnosed here most often by female psychiatrists, and carries the connotation: The implications are lack of self-control, and reliance on external supports.
Thin female with a lot of anger. By example, the woman who comes for treatment of "depression" but describes most life events in terms of attacks, sleights, harm, etc-- i.
If you are a patient, my point in telling you this iss not "why did they diagnose me with borderline?learning disabilities (LD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). What Are Some Negative Consequences of Diagnostic Labelling? The following is a synthesis of major negative side effects related to labeling children and.
arteensevilla.com: Only Connect: Readings on Children's Literature (): Sheila Egoff, Gordon Stubbs, Ralph Ashley, Wendy Sutton: Books.
Special Education plays an important role in American Education. It is a very common thing in this world to have some sort of disability whether it is mental or physical. Parents also rely on the schools to include their disabled child into a normal life, surrounded by those who will teach them.
The advantages of labeling were more obvious in the formative years of special education (mids to early s), than they are now.
For instance, without the category of learning disabilities. A diagnosis of borderline personality disorder could, theoretically, mean that the psychiatrist made a serious attempt at evaluating defense mechanisms and ego integrity; or at least a matching of symptoms to DSM criteria.
It's theoretically possible, yes. Special education is a “specifically designed instruction, at no cost to parents, to meet the unique needs of a child with a disability, including instruction conducted in the classroom, in the home, in hospitals and institutions, and in other settings; and instruction in physical education.